Moral Rights in Film: What Italy Won’t Let You Waive

Last updated: October 2026 — by Avv. Claudia Roggero, Rome Bar since 2003, entertainment and copyright law, DANDI.media

A film is modified throughout its life: dubbed, re-cut, restored, reformatted, colourised, and now de-aged and voice-replaced with AI. In Italy, four co-authors and every performer hold rights against those modifications that no contract can remove. The answer is not a waiver, which is void here, but a structure that manages those rights instead of pretending they do not exist.

Who holds moral rights in an Italian film

Article 44 of the Italian Copyright Act (LDA) names four co-authors of a cinematographic work: the author of the story, the author of the screenplay, the composer of the music written for the film, and the director. Each holds moral rights in the film: to be credited, to object to changes that harm their honour or reputation, and to decide on its release. Under Article 10 LDA each co-author can defend these rights individually: one objection is enough.

The producer is not a co-author and holds no moral rights, however creative its role. This is the biggest difference from US practice, where work for hire makes the producer the author. Cinematographers, editors and designers are not co-authors of the film either, although they may own rights in their own contributions as separate works.

Performers have their own protection. Under Article 81 LDA they can object to uses of their performance that harm their honour or reputation, and their personality rights under Article 10 of the Civil Code apply separately: a performer may have no copyright claim and still a strong personality rights claim on the same facts.

The director and final cut

The director’s right of integrity (Article 20 LDA) gives strong protection against modifications that harm their honour or reputation, and it cannot be sold. The balance is set by Article 47 LDA, which allows the producer to make the modifications necessary for the cinematographic adaptation of the contributions; changes going beyond that need the director’s acceptance. In practice, a producer holding contractual final cut under California law does not hold it in Italy: for exploitation in Italy, the director’s Italian rights apply whatever the US agreement says.

The integrity right is most often engaged by re-editing without consent, colourisation, dubbing that changes tone or meaning, AI modification and structural changes for new distribution windows. The screenwriter and the composer hold parallel rights. For the composer, the usual pressure points are replacing the score late in post-production, re-orchestrating or extending the music with AI, and using it in sequels, trailers or games.

Dubbing, restoration and platform edits

Italy’s dubbing tradition makes this a question on almost every foreign film released here. Dubbing can engage the director’s and screenwriter’s integrity if the translation changes the meaning, the original performers’ rights because their voices are replaced, and new rights in the dubbed performance and the dubbing script. Distribution agreements for the Italian market should deal with it expressly.

The Huston case is still the reference for restoration and colourisation. John Huston’s heirs objected to the colourisation of The Asphalt Jungle and won before the French Court of Cassation on 28 May 1991, after losing in the United States. The principles apply in Italy too: moral rights govern exploitation in the country whatever law the contract chose, they survive the assignment of economic rights, and heirs can enforce them decades later. Our article on film colourisation and the right of integrity tells the story in full.

The same reasoning applies to AI colourisation, aggressive remastering, aspect ratio changes that alter the composition, cuts for television slots or national ratings, and territorial edits on streaming platforms. Minimal restoration that preserves the work as made rarely causes problems; heavy intervention can.

AI: deepfakes, voice cloning, de-aging

AI does not create a new kind of moral rights problem, but it creates modifications on a new scale, applied to material contracted for before anyone imagined them. A deepfake performance, a cloned voice or a de-aged face can engage at once the performer’s rights (Article 81 LDA), the director’s integrity (Article 20), personality rights (Article 10 of the Civil Code) and the transparency rules of the EU AI Act and Italian Law 132/2025. A consent given before these tools existed almost certainly does not cover them, and Italian law reads that silence against the producer.

The AI clause required by the Italian tax credit

Italy has turned this protection into a condition for public funding. Under the tax credit decrees (D.I. 225/2024 for the national production credit, Article 7(6), and D.I. 329/2024 for the credit for foreign productions, Article 9(4)), contracts with authors and performers must contain clauses allowing authors to refuse the use of their work by AI systems, and performers to refuse the use of their image or performance. For foreign productions the sanction is the inadmissibility of the application. The productions must also declare which parts of the work used AI, and AI costs replacing above-the-line creative work are not eligible, except for special effects relating to lead actors.

The clause does not oblige performers to consent or to refuse: it obliges the contract to give them a real choice. The usual problem is timing. Talent agreements are signed early, often on foreign templates, months before anyone prepares the tax credit application, and by then they can no longer be fixed cheaply. A good clause separates AI training, AI modification, voice synthesis, posthumous use and what happens if consent is withdrawn. Our guide to Italian film tax credits covers the wider rules.

Heirs

Moral rights in Italy have no time limit. Under Article 23 LDA, after an author’s death they can be exercised by the spouse and children, then by parents and other direct relatives, then by siblings and their descendants. With four co-authors, each with heirs, the people entitled to object to a restoration or an AI modification of an old film can be many, and one objection is enough.

How producers manage what cannot be waived

Moral rights cannot be removed, but they can be managed. Two tools work:

• Agreed modifications. Instead of a void waiver, the contract lists the modifications the author accepts in specific contexts: standard exhibition and distribution, ordinary restoration, dubbing for foreign markets, trailers and promotion. The more precise the list, the more likely it holds.
• Approval procedures. Article 22 LDA provides that an author who knew of and accepted modifications to the work can no longer act to stop them. The producer proposes a specific modification, such as a colourised version, a new cut or an AI de-aging, and the author approves or refuses. It is slower than a waiver, but it works.

A modern contract should also identify the authoritative version of the film, the permitted dubbing and language versions, the rules on AI use of likeness and voice, posthumous use and the AI clauses the tax credit requires. For international releases, territory-specific annexes, a designated master cut and obligations flowing down to sub-distributors prevent most conflicts.

How we can help

DANDI.media | Entertainment Law & Co-Production Strategies advises producers, distributors, directors, screenwriters, composers, performers and heirs on moral rights in film and television: we draft author and performer agreements with agreed modifications, approval procedures and AI clauses; adapt US and UK contracts so that they work in Italy; and handle disputes over integrity, restoration and AI modifications. Foreign media law firms regularly instruct us on the Italian side of a production or clearance. Book a consultation.

FAQ

Who are the co-authors of a film under Italian law?

Under Article 44 of the Italian Copyright Act: the author of the story, the author of the screenplay, the composer of the music written for the film, and the director. The producer is not a co-author.

Does the director have final cut in Italy?

Not as such, but close. The director’s integrity right under Article 20 LDA lets them object to modifications that prejudice their honour or reputation, and it cannot be sold. The producer, for its part, may make the modifications needed to adapt the work (Article 47 LDA). Anything beyond that is best handled through the approval mechanism of Article 22 LDA.

Do US moral rights waivers work in Italy?

No. A waiver has no effect on exploitation in Italy. The assignment of economic rights in the same contract may be fully effective; the waiver is not.

Do AI de-aging and deepfakes trigger moral rights?

Yes. They can engage the performer’s rights (Article 81 LDA), the director’s integrity (Article 20 LDA) and personality rights under the Civil Code, on top of the transparency rules of the EU AI Act and Law 132/2025.

What is the AI clause required by the Italian tax credit?

Contracts with authors and performers must let them refuse the use of their work, image or performance by AI systems: Article 7(6) of D.I. 225/2024 for the national credit, Article 9(4) of D.I. 329/2024 for foreign productions, where its absence makes the application inadmissible.

Can heirs object to a restoration or AI modification?

Yes, without time limit. Article 23 LDA lists the heirs entitled to act, and one objection is enough.

Related guides

This guide states the position at the date above. Confirm current provisions before relying on it for a live production.

Dandi Law Firm provides legal assistance in several Practice Areas. Check out our Services or contact Us!